Forum Replies Created
April 5, 2020 at 3:35 pm in reply to: html comments Error: please disable html optimizers #8018
Yes, me too I noticed this. Alex, It is something tha we should expect? It can be avoided in somehow this popup message?
Best regardsApril 5, 2020 at 3:33 pm in reply to: Incompatibility of QR code libraries with 2FA plugin #8017
I hope you are doing well, splecially during this sanitary crisis we are facing.
After updating to Version 5.0.0 (big thank you for this release! excellent work), I noticed again the same reported conflict for the frontend QR code for the 2FA settings frontend page. The QR code does not show up properly.
Please Alex, could you have a look? and tell what should I do to fix it?
Thanks in advance
I understand, no need to explain how engnineers works.
My point is that in order to use the main wallt extensions, interesting and popular applications are necessary. Nowadays a Marktplace is a very used business model and almost mandatory in many cases. Pointing to wmpc, the extension is extremely popular and introduces many changes and unique features since version 3.4.0, and in my opinion is a market winner.
If there is no adaptation to other applications, the possibilities and usability of your extension would be very limited (my opinion) in terms of competitive advantage with wallts out there.
It would be a bad surprise if you decide to not support the current plugin, many effort in testing and searching was made. The current version works properly, and the only thing I asked it was if it is possible to make paymnts automatic, but it is clear now.
Please have a consideration about it.
Thank you for your reply.
It is possible at least to give some gidelines on how to adapt the automatic move to vendrs to the already existing cron hook from wmpc?
It would be much appreciated your help on this issue, I think you know that automation it is something standard nowadays.
I hope you are doing well.
It has been 2 months from the date I wrote you about this topic automatic disbrals, and I am wondering if you had the time to check for the adaptation.
Thanks as usual,
Thanks Alex for the clarification.
I understand, and that is why for the short term I asked for integrating this feature using a third part service like the cloud adapters. It is not easy to find card processors that accepts crytposs for buying,i.e. if you check for example Strpe terms, it is not allowed. In case you resealse some solution for this, it will be good to know card processors for this service.
Thanks to you also for implementing all the proposed backlog contribution, I really appreciate your help and consideration. From our side, I hope it was just testing something, but for ideas conceptualization it takes more than that.
1. Of course, I understand. When I proposed the original codebase I imagined that it would be not the perfect match, but at least a feasible solution.
2. When I found the issues I deactivated everything and just tested with direct transfers, and found that it is a bug related to the plugin. OK Alex, once I have an answer and a base fix from them, I will keep you posted on a new thread if there is some persistent issues.
3. It is a setting that has the plugin to allow automatic disburals through strpe or papal. If you go to payments setting you will find “Disbursement Schedule > If checked, automatically vendors commission will disburse.”, which triggers a specific hook. I will open a new thread about it.
I made some orders, and it is just great! As far I could test, no issues founded.
Regarding the exchange rate code you provided for customs, where exactly should I put the code? functins.php?
Thank you Alex,
I am getting back tou you about widthrawal issues in relation with partially refunded orders and automatic disbursals.
I dont know if you had the time to check, but I think the partially refunded order commission issue it is a wmcp bug, so I asked them about it. I will keep you posted about it.
I also asked about automtic disbursls, and it is possible for gatways like strpe or papal. Please Alex, could you implement a replication of the massspay cron action in order to allow automatic disbrals to vendors wallts? It would be just great and a very efficient.
Thanks for your great work as usual
I appreciate your work.
I took some time to check, and there are still some issues with refnded orders. Commsions from orders that have been partially refundd are not saving in the frontnd Bankgn Overview and are not being transfered to the vendr wllet (in backend are marked as Paid).
Regarding your las point about disabling the Request option for vendors, I think it is not the best approach, but if you think it has to be like that at this moment OK. From this approach, it is not that efficient from operations point of view if as an Admin I have to pay manually.
So I enabled the option in backend “Disbrsmnt schdule” -> “If checked, automaticlly vendrs commison will disburse” to see and it is relly an option that could improve this manual paymnt point. Checking the cron evnts, i tsted it but it does not work, Could you Alex have a look at it? Could you adapt it in order to allow automatic disbursments to vendrs wallt?
Thank you Alex as usual,
I do really appreciate your hard working.
The solution seems correct for me if the vendor has selected crpytogateway for its commsions disbursals. For purely fiatpaymnts there is the directbank transfer option, which I hope it will not be in conflict with this future implementation.
“…If the cart was not paid with a cryptocurrency…”, this ideally should consider any payment done with card, strpe, pypal…
If the admin has to choose the default crptocurrncy for conversions in order to pay commssions, what exchange rate would apply? a spot rate at the date of disbursal, or the spot rate at the order date? because in case of high volatility it would be not ideal for vendors.
Another question that comme to my mind, what if I choosed a cstom internal coin/pont, how to implement the exchnge rate?
Please keep me posted
Thank you Alex as usual
Thanks for getting back to this issue. Yes, as I could see it was fixed in V3.4.5, but the main issue in this topic it is about recording the withdrawls.
When the vendr performs a withrawland and it is correctly completed, in frontend dashboard, in Stats/reports–>Bankingovrview, the withraw operation does not record in the table. It should appear a new row showing the Debit. I tested using card for example and the corresponding row to withdrawal appears.
Alex, have a look in that table and you will find the issue.
Please let me know.
PS: for the card paymnt issue thanks for checking as usualNovember 23, 2019 at 1:38 pm in reply to: Add links to specific market pages from the market summaries UI #7339
I found in the release that the “visit the markt” link is added to dynamic template. I clicked on it but it does not work, there is no redirection to page when clicking (I have assigned pages on my backnd).
Another problem I found, is on the exchng page, the horizontal scrollbar does not scroll until the end of the table, it stays at the half of “Visit the markt”.
Could you have a look?
Thanks Alex for your reply. Since only one gatway can be selected for disbursals, this is a big problem because it is a limitation.
As a suggestion, I would be not possible to link the fiat disbursal (for orders payd with card) adding that amount to the vendr balance once the order is completed and asked for disbursal? maybe you have a better idea
I just made a test making an order using card, and from the order side I found it is OK. But the problem comes when the vendor asks for the disbursal. As a vendr, when asked for disbrsal, the next error showed:
– process_payment(): Could not pay 3.45 EUR in to vendr demo for subordrers 10010 and commsions 10011, because the EUR_exchnge rate is not known.
– Could not pay 0.000000 (3.45 EUR) in comissions to vendor demo: Adapter for ” is not online for move action
Geting back to this topic, I did not ued the public function described in the documentation. But, checking a bit the images inside the files, the corresponding to custom ones is named “Custom”.
Let’s suppose I want to implement different custom ones, there would be a conflict if using the filter targetting the same overrided icon, dont you think?
It would be possible, when adding a custom from backnd, to add a feature to allow chosing an icon from the media library?