[bigblue]

I could imagine about the confusing threads.

Alex, here I am not asking for distingishing between fiat and customs. I am asking for giving the same behaviour for fiat as for customs on the Deposits and Withdrawals CRYPTO UIS.

The fiat are hidden correctly on those interfaces, but the customs are still showing up. They shoud be hidden as fiat do.

I hope I expressed myself in a more clear way.

Please let me know if you cant see what I am talking about

[bigblue]

Hi Alex,

Maybe I was not clear enough explaining it.

The point here is not the exchange, but Deposit and Withdrawal UI’s for cryptos. When it comes to fiat it works correctly, so not showing up on those UIs. But the customs still shows up, which is incorrect.

Just asking to make the customs hiden in those interfaces, as for fiats do, nothing separately.

Could you have a look?

Thank you in advance

Best regards

[bigblue]

Of course Alex, what you mention is correct, but for fiat. I have set up fixer.io and for fiat is correct.

The point here is not fiat, but customs ones, they still show. Try to add some and see it checkt it, you will find them.

Please Alex if you can check on it again. Much appreciated.

Thank you again

Best regards

[bigblue]

Hi Alex,

Thank you for thinking on this.

Actually the disctinction is a need both for a better user experience and for organisation. I would much appreciate if you can consider this for the 3 categories crypto/custom/fiat. If fiat/custm goes together there will be confusion.

That is the idea, from the main plugin’s UIs like the balances table and them the exchnge table also.

I was thinking in something like:

Cryptos:
A
B
C…
Fiat:
AA
BB
CC..
Custom:
AAA
BBB
CCC…

Much appreciated your work

Thanks

Best regards

[bigblue]

Thanks Alex for your reply.

This is something really needed in my opinion, since as it is actually leads to some confusions with real cryptos appearing alongside in the deposits/withdrawal UI.

I would much appreciate if you can consider this. I wold be glad to know about your decision.

Thanks as usual

Best regards

[bigblue]

Hi Alex,

Indeed the approach you are talking about is a bigger change, but it would give more bigger control for admins. That’s why I suggested it initially just for customcoints, just for the deposit and widthrawal UI, and if eventually if also for movetransfrs better, but in this last case it should not affect the exchnge if a markt is enabled for that custom, so it should affect only the transfers UI between usrs (adding eventually a capability of who can send/receive customs).

I think this gives a better management in terms of categories type/operation, like in this case for customs where I do not see what kind of use case fits with the deposit/widthrawls (for now).

That’s it Alex, more or less is that, for credits (still in conception).

Thanks to you. Let me know what do you think.

Best regards

[bigblue]

Good day Alex,

Much appreciated your help.

I consider you are talking also about the withdrawalUI, it is true that they do not show up in thisadapter, but they do in the main general wihdrawals interface. That is why I mentionned both interfaces.

Regarding the dropdowns, the only thing that I would add to my comment, is about the rest of insterfaces. Shoud not affect the balance,trsnfer andhistory interfaces. In somehow when I check a certain coin from the dropdowns in one of them, it automatically update the rest of interfaces on the same page, which is excellent in terms of navigation.

Maybe if you consider it is feasible with no much complicated work, in the option you mention adding a checkbox for each custom in order to chose wich can be shown in deposit and withdrawals and wich not.

Thank again for your consideration and great work!

Best regards

[bigblue]

Correct Alex, I was meaning the public shortcodes, which are the same for both publinc and non-public, like markets, market history…

Thanks for the clarification. Much appreciated your consideration.

Best regards

[bigblue]

Hello Alex,

Thank you for your help, it works.

With the new form template I was not able to find the correct classes in the console to modify the CSS.

Thanks as usual

Best regards

[bigblue]

Thanks Alex for the provided CSS. I played a bit with it and it looks better.

Just some more things:
-How can I adjust the logo sizes inside the dropdown selector, like in toher forms?
-How can I adjust the top marging for the Exchnge button?
-How can I center the Exchange button in the UI?
-Possible to make change the column proportion size in order to fullfil the row where it is placed, like 2/5+2/5+1/5?

Please see the attached screenshot

Thanks Alex

Best regards

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[bigblue]

Hello Alex,

I appreciate your consideration and your dedication.

I think this features will allow a much use of it, and also would improve useracquisition.

For the displayed form for nonloggedin users, some text forms like providing a username (anonymous by default) for the comments they want to write, and for some kind of reminder “do you have an account? if so, you can do it dricetly from your wallet! If no, register here” (with the option for the admin to set the registration page url).

If the user is logged in, the form showd include both options, an internal move from his wllts and the author deposit adress and qr to allow external depst.

Well, those are just some ideas if you want to consider them when you will be bak to this app. Sure you can do better.

Thanks Alex, I look forward into this

Best regards

[bigblue]

Hello Alex,

I hope you are doing well.

I took the time to see how it looks the rewritten modle. It works really great with improvements!

I wanted to ask you this formerly and found by casualty you have moved it into a suggestion. Additionaly to what you mention, I am wondering if you could improve it by giving the flexibility to non loggedin users and/or non registered users to perform atip by displayng the QR code and adress, just like the deposit form for crypts. The form (move transtaction) for logged in users should not display if it is a non loggedin or registred user. It would be possible?

Thank you in advance as usual

I look forward into it

Best regards

[bigblue]

Alex,

I do not know if it is related or not. You mention that now it is possible to add bankinfo for custom coinss, but what kind of use for it? for non supported currencies in the fixer API?

I suppose you did not had the time to check about setting different icons for the customcoins. I am not sure if the mentionned filter can be used for a custom one, because as I could test, it relyes to the icon named “Custom”. I does not know how to make it different for different custom created ones.

Thanks as usual

Regards

[bigblue]

Hello Alex,

Updating to the last version, the popup message does not appear anymore. As I could see you moved the comment to console, but checking on my console it does not appear, so it was a bug?

I want to mention also that since V5.0.0, in console, for non logged in users there is an error in the console:

Failed to load resource: ….?__wallets_apiversion=3&__wallets_action=get_coins_info the server responded with a status of 403 ()

I clicked on the link in a new window and it gives: {“result”:”error”,”code”:-106,”message”:”Must be logged in or specify a valid API key”}

Could you check it?

PD: please tell me if I should post it to a new thread if has no relation with the HTML comments

Thank you

Best regards

[bigblue]

Hello,

First of all, a big thank you for your help and for your excellent work.

I udated to 5.0.1 and it seems fixed.

Thank you

Best regards

[Author]

Posts