Forum Replies Created
Thanks for getting back to this issue. Yes, as I could see it was fixed in V3.4.5, but the main issue in this topic it is about recording the withdrawls.
When the vendr performs a withrawland and it is correctly completed, in frontend dashboard, in Stats/reports–>Bankingovrview, the withraw operation does not record in the table. It should appear a new row showing the Debit. I tested using card for example and the corresponding row to withdrawal appears.
Alex, have a look in that table and you will find the issue.
Please let me know.
PS: for the card paymnt issue thanks for checking as usual
I found in the release that the “visit the markt” link is added to dynamic template. I clicked on it but it does not work, there is no redirection to page when clicking (I have assigned pages on my backnd).
Another problem I found, is on the exchng page, the horizontal scrollbar does not scroll until the end of the table, it stays at the half of “Visit the markt”.
Could you have a look?
Thanks Alex for your reply. Since only one gatway can be selected for disbursals, this is a big problem because it is a limitation.
As a suggestion, I would be not possible to link the fiat disbursal (for orders payd with card) adding that amount to the vendr balance once the order is completed and asked for disbursal? maybe you have a better idea
I just made a test making an order using card, and from the order side I found it is OK. But the problem comes when the vendor asks for the disbursal. As a vendr, when asked for disbrsal, the next error showed:
– process_payment(): Could not pay 3.45 EUR in to vendr demo for subordrers 10010 and commsions 10011, because the EUR_exchnge rate is not known.
– Could not pay 0.000000 (3.45 EUR) in comissions to vendor demo: Adapter for ” is not online for move action
Geting back to this topic, I did not ued the public function described in the documentation. But, checking a bit the images inside the files, the corresponding to custom ones is named “Custom”.
Let’s suppose I want to implement different custom ones, there would be a conflict if using the filter targetting the same overrided icon, dont you think?
It would be possible, when adding a custom from backnd, to add a feature to allow chosing an icon from the media library?
Exact, that is why I was asking in my first post, if maybe you was aware of any free service out there.
At some moment a decision should be taken, running something compliant at a certain cost, or being out of legality.
I am thinking now, using cloud wllt services like conpyments, as they did asking for KYC, maybe they will implement this from their side? do you know if they are working on this?
You said that you are not running an exchange (not even Shapshft?) for thi reason. But as I knew, all transactions will must be under this regultion, even for deposits. I spoke in person to some people working with governments in Europe to have guidelines about this, and it is not limited only to exchanges.
Of course if I discover something I will definitelyy let you know.
Thanks for the link. The link I provided is one of the existing ones out there.
In the occasions I have met people from fnds for example, the question of “it is legal and compliant?” was very common.
Please Alex, consider its implementation because it will be mandatory, and if we want to run a legal business, this is something definitely prioritary if we consider compliance.
Thanks as usual
Thanks Alex for your suggeston.
For KYC process actually is simpler. With some form and handling the capability manually it should be OK. But an automated or near automated should be better if you can implement something.
For AML is more complicated, and that was my principal concern. Because the new regulations will ask to check if the crpytos are clean, and this involves tracking the crypto on the blockchain befaore it enters the wallet if it is OK. That is why I sent you the previous link, they offer an API for BTC and other relevant ones.
Please Alex keep me posted,
I understand your point Alex. It is just taht I am a fanatic about security and quality support and I was thinking about worst scenarios.
Imagine that someone fixes an eye on you and your business, and wants to steal you, he can do it anywhere with the only requirment of having you (as admin with the capability) in front of you, so you are vulnerable, the only thing needed in this case is connecting a hardware wllet for example and proceed to the storage.
According to this scenario, just a simple solution example I am having now. It is possible to give for a Super Admin role the capability of adding whitelisted IP’s for cold storaging? In case a super admin performs a cold sotrage process from a non whitelisted IP, an e-mail confirmation is sent both to the Super Admin and the Admin assigned for the whitelisted IP.
I think it is essential to ensure costumers, so if I am subcontracting a security company for this, the customers should be more confident.
The security in this case I thing it is really strenghted and more serious, don’t you think?
Thank you Alex, please keep me posted. If I can be of any help please let me know.
Thanks as usual
I hope you are doing well.
The version 3.4.5 is already released, and according to the changelog the issue is fixed (#135).
Please could you check for the fix with the adapter?
Thanks in advance,
No problem about the delay, but I appreciate your consideration.
If you think that the first proposal could complicate things then it is better the second approach.
I checked on the link you provided and it looks good. Just maybe adding a line on top of the suggestions with a different color telling the user for example “Recently used” or similar, in order to not confuse him about thinking that it is a search among all existing users in the site.
Regarding this method, do you think it could interfere with some other existing function used in wp or some popular plugins?
This can be a good add, if possible.
Thanks Alex as usual
I hope you are doing well.
I wanted just to keep you updated about the mentioned issues. After many exchanges and tests with their team, finnaly the bug is identified and uploaded to Git. You can follow if you want, the issue number is #135.
Officially, it is planned to be fixed for the comming release (V34.5).
Thanks Alex. I agree with you about the reasoning, it is correct.
I did not get back to you because I am still waiting for their confirmation, in order to know exactly if it is an error or not.
I will inform you about it in order to adress the issue properly as you said.
Thank you again,
PS: I will open a new discussion for the e-mail notification.
I hope you are doing well. Sorry for getting back to you bit late.
Answering your questions:
I made the same tests as you and found the same results. I want to think that it is the expected behaviour, I asked in case.
Now, when I activated the plugin, and followed the same flow of orders, I found:
– In Withdrawals history, it saves only the “completed” (the wthdrawal) order. In case of Bank Trnsfrs, the first order is marked as “processing”, and then when the admn pays and marks the ordr as padd, then a second one appears with “completed” status in frontend (2 in total).
– In Bankng overview it only records the commission, but not the withdrawal.
Alex, by the way, I want to ask regarding wthdrawls about the gateways fees and email notification:
– I assume that the fees issue (topic) it is not addressed yet.
– It would be possible to trigger the same email notifications like for Bank Transfr? I think it is important as receipt of payment (but telling that the dpost is made on the wllt).
Thank you as usual for your great help.